Archive for the ‘News’ Category

Happy birthday beyondwords

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

I’m usually fairly decent at remembering birthdays, but I just realized today that I completely missed our blog anniversary…by a month. So, first off, happy belated birthday to beyondwords!

Secondly, thank you to all of our contributors and readers. It’s been a great two years sharing with the professional writing community, and in that spirit of sharing, beyondwords wants to give two readers a little something something.

Gift #1: So You Need a Typeface poster
so-you-need-a-typeface
Julian Hansen’s sweet “So You Need a Typeface” design is now available as a poster from Scribble. The 24×18″ print is done in metallic silver ink on Astrobrights Eclipse Black 80# Cover.

Gift #2: HTML5 for Web Designers
buy-html5-for-web-designers
Author Jeremy Keith seeks to simplify the web’s new markup language in this 85-page guide, the first publication from A Book Apart.

How can you get one of these gifts? Just leave a comment telling us (1) what you like about beyondwords or what you’d like to see more of on the blog, and (2) which gift you’d like. We’ll draw two names at random on Monday, May 10 at 5pm EST.

Update: Thank you for all of the great feedback, and congratulations to John and Kathryn, winners of our giveaway!

The preservation of Twitter

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

twitter-archiveIt doesn’t matter if you’re a person talking about drinking coffee, a celebrity promoting new work, or a politician announcing a historical victory—your tweets are now permanently saved. Today the Library of Congress announced, via Twitter, that it will archive all public tweets. Twitter soon followed with its own announcement:

Since Twitter began, billions of tweets have been created. Today, fifty-five million tweets a day are sent to Twitter and that number is climbing sharply. A tiny percentage of accounts are protected but most of these tweets are created with the intent that they will be publicly available. Over the years, tweets have become part of significant global events around the world—from historic elections to devastating disasters.

It is our pleasure to donate access to the entire archive of public Tweets to the Library of Congress for preservation and research. It’s very exciting that tweets are becoming part of history.

Now, not only am I an avid Twitter user, but I am also married to a history buff who has repeatedly denounced Twitter as a “waste of time” because the data wasn’t being stored for research purposes. But Twitter’s API has limits on how many of your tweets you can personally archive using applications such as Tweetbook. The fact that now all future and past data from the social networking tool will be publicly archived is a huge step forward in terms of scholarly research.

But that’s not all—Google also announced Google Replay today.

Tweets and other short-form updates create a history of commentary that can provide valuable insights into what’s happened and how people have reacted. We want to give you a way to search across this information and make it useful. Starting today, you can zoom to any point in time and “replay” what people were saying publicly about a topic on Twitter.

While Google Replay currently only searches tweets from the past few months, it will soon allow real-time search of the entire Twitter archive. As for the Library’s archive, Twitter says, “Only after a six-month delay can the Tweets be used for internal library use, for non-commercial research, public display by the library itself, and preservation.”

It’s still unclear as to why the Library of Congress has to wait and Google doesn’t, but that’s just one of many questions raised by Twitter’s digital preservation—like what my husband’s excuse for not tweeting will be now.

Weekend showdown: Amazon vs. Macmillan

Monday, February 1st, 2010

It was a busy weekend in the publishing world after the unveiling of the iPad last week sparked a showdown in the e-book market between Amazon and Macmillan.

amazon-macmillan

In an effort to pre-empt Apple’s challenge to their share of the e-book market, Amazon reduced their e-book publishing cut from 70% to 30% one week prior to the iPad announcement. However, in order to get the higher royalty option, authors must acknowledge Amazon as a publisher, grant licensing rights to the company for the Kindle publishing platform, and let them set the e-book price — no higher than $9.99.

Macmillan, one of five publishers who has partnered with Apple, met with Amazon on Thursday to request the price of e-books be raised from $9.99 to about $15 to prevent book devaluation. Amazon response? To remove all books published by Macmillan — e-books, hardcovers, and paperbacks — from its site on Friday, excepting those available from third party sellers.

In a statement to its authors, illustrators, and agents, Macmillan CEO John Sargent said:

In the ink-on-paper world we sell books to retailers far and wide on a business model that provides a level playing field, and allows all retailers the possibility of selling books profitably. Looking to the future and to a growing digital business, we need to establish the same sort of business model, one that encourages new devices and new stores.

[...] It also needs to insure that intellectual property can be widely available digitally at a price that is both fair to the consumer and allows those who create it and publish it to be fairly compensated. [...] Our disagreement is not about short-term profitability but rather about the long-term viability and stability of the digital book market.

The move by Amazon was met with anger and frustration from the literary community as the news of the “Amazon Fail” quickly spread online. Amazon was silent on the matter until Sunday:

[...] We have expressed our strong disagreement and the seriousness of our disagreement by temporarily ceasing the sale of all Macmillan titles. We want you to know that ultimately, however, we will have to capitulate and accept Macmillan’s terms because Macmillan has a monopoly over their own titles, and we will want to offer them to you even at prices we believe are needlessly high for e-books.

Amazon customers will at that point decide for themselves whether they believe it’s reasonable to pay $14.99 for a bestselling e-book. We don’t believe that all of the major publishers will take the same route as Macmillan. And we know for sure that many independent presses and self-published authors will see this as an opportunity to provide attractively priced e-books as an alternative.

In their carefully worded capitulation statement, the company shows they believe customers will side with them by refusing to pay $14.99 for an e-book. Some people have commented on the statement with support for Amazon’s “pro-consumer” model and $9.99 price cap, citing a “Macmillan Fail“. Others support Macmillan and believe $14.99 is a fair price. Only one thing is certain: the weekend battle may have ended, but the war is far from over.

Apple’s latest innovation: the iPad

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

There was much discussion (and premature, unsanctioned confirmation) about what must-have, can’t-live-without product would be revealed at this year’s Apple conference. On Wednesday, CEO Steve Jobs officially introduced Apple’s take on the tablet: the iPad.

apple-ipad

Apple’s latest “magical and revolutionary device” was met with both oohs and ewws. Design and tech specs aside, let’s take a look at some of the reactions from publishing and branding perspectives.

Digital reading

The publishing industry continues to evolve as traditional print practices are challenged by the demand for online content. With the iPad, Apple is making sure it’s a part of that shift:

Apple isn’t just entering the e-book reader market — it’s also challenging Amazon with its new bookstore app, iBooks. Publishers Penguin, Simon and Schuster, HarperCollins, Macmillan, and Hachett have already made deals with Apple.

What’s in a name?

As for the name of the new tablet, my initial reaction to “iPad” was “iNotepad”. But the negative responses to the name choice should give Apple pause:

The tablet won’t start shipping until late-March, which gives the company time to listen, react, and hopefully improve upon people’s first impressions. What was yours?

Sweet Tweets

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

With Valentine’s Day less than a month away, it’s not surprising to see companies are already stepping up marketing campaigns to cash in on what is often referred to as a “Hallmark holiday“.

sweet-tweetsBut I was surprised when USA Today announced a new angle that couples tradition with social media. Sweethearts, the 145-year-old brand of candy conversation hearts, will add “Tweet Me” to its repertoire. In the new relationship, Twitter is the talkative one with its 140 characters.

“We’ve always been short and sweet,” says Jackie Hague, vice president of marketing at New England Confectionery, maker of the Sweethearts brand. “In this case, the technology merged with the ritual.”

The partnership doesn’t end there — the confectioner also created an iPhone app that links with your Twitter account so you can customize your candy messages. The virtual candy grams can then be sent privately to the recipient or posted in your Twitter stream. And for those without iPhones, there’s MySweethearts.com.

custom-hearts

From a marketing standpoint, the Sweethearts and Twitter match makes sense — both have limited space for characters, and there’s no denying the multitude of catchphrases possible (Tweethearts, anyone?).

But as much as I love both the candy and the social network, I wonder about the audience for the online survey done by Sweethearts last summer. Where were Facebook’s 350+ million users voting for “Friend Me”? The common phrase didn’t even make the top 10.

Condé Naste and Disney make publishing news

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

Gourmet Magazine ceases print publicationThere has been some big news in the publishing industry recently, beginning with Condé Naste announcing the closure of four magazines. Gourmet, the oldest culinary magazine in America, will cease print publication after a final November issue, but continue to offer content via its website. Cookie, Modern Bride, and Elegant Bride are also being shut down.

Magazines and newspapers alike continue to struggle to generate profits with print publications — and print ads.

[...] publishers can no longer rely on the traditional print advertising model alone to see them through to profits. [..] Not only is the future of print in adapting to new models, be it digitally or beyond, but it also will be about finding several revenue streams from their content to offset losses from advertising, and rethinking the old — and sometimes cost inefficient — processes for producing magazines.

But as nice as “go digital” sounds as a solution, there is still the issue of how to generate revenue from online content. Should it be ad-based? Subscriber-based? Will readers pay for online content? These are just a few of the questions that are debated as publications move online and e-publishing continues to grow. Now the industry will have a big-name example to potentially follow: Disney.

Today The Walt Disney Company launched a subscription-based website — DisneyDigitalBooks.com — where it offers hundreds of digital children’s books for $79.95 a year. Users can choose stories that they read themselves, or follow along on the screen as voice actors read the books to them.

By pursuing a subscription online model — as opposed to focusing on downloads and sales for devices like the Kindle — Disney is placing a specific bet about where the children’s market is going, at least in the next three to five years. The move could send ripples through this corner of publishing, if only because of the size of Disney, which annually sells 250 million children’s books.

Disney’s plan is to utilize the online space to lead into other areas of the market that were previously unavailable to them, such as language learning. But as more content is being made available digitally, there are some fears that the increase in electronic publications will lead to widespread online file sharing and abuse of copyright, causing the publishing industry to suffer the same fate as the recording industry.

From choosing a revenue generating plan to choosing the best medium for their content, it’s clear that magazine, newspaper, and book publishers have many hard decisions ahead of them. It will be interesting to see how successful the industry is as a whole at adapting their business strategies to the digital world.

Tweeting

Friday, October 2nd, 2009

beyondwords is now on Twitter! You can follow us @beyondwordsblog.