Posts Tagged ‘copyright’

Condé Naste and Disney make publishing news

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

Gourmet Magazine ceases print publicationThere has been some big news in the publishing industry recently, beginning with Condé Naste announcing the closure of four magazines. Gourmet, the oldest culinary magazine in America, will cease print publication after a final November issue, but continue to offer content via its website. Cookie, Modern Bride, and Elegant Bride are also being shut down.

Magazines and newspapers alike continue to struggle to generate profits with print publications — and print ads.

[...] publishers can no longer rely on the traditional print advertising model alone to see them through to profits. [..] Not only is the future of print in adapting to new models, be it digitally or beyond, but it also will be about finding several revenue streams from their content to offset losses from advertising, and rethinking the old — and sometimes cost inefficient — processes for producing magazines.

But as nice as “go digital” sounds as a solution, there is still the issue of how to generate revenue from online content. Should it be ad-based? Subscriber-based? Will readers pay for online content? These are just a few of the questions that are debated as publications move online and e-publishing continues to grow. Now the industry will have a big-name example to potentially follow: Disney.

Today The Walt Disney Company launched a subscription-based website — DisneyDigitalBooks.com — where it offers hundreds of digital children’s books for $79.95 a year. Users can choose stories that they read themselves, or follow along on the screen as voice actors read the books to them.

By pursuing a subscription online model — as opposed to focusing on downloads and sales for devices like the Kindle — Disney is placing a specific bet about where the children’s market is going, at least in the next three to five years. The move could send ripples through this corner of publishing, if only because of the size of Disney, which annually sells 250 million children’s books.

Disney’s plan is to utilize the online space to lead into other areas of the market that were previously unavailable to them, such as language learning. But as more content is being made available digitally, there are some fears that the increase in electronic publications will lead to widespread online file sharing and abuse of copyright, causing the publishing industry to suffer the same fate as the recording industry.

From choosing a revenue generating plan to choosing the best medium for their content, it’s clear that magazine, newspaper, and book publishers have many hard decisions ahead of them. It will be interesting to see how successful the industry is as a whole at adapting their business strategies to the digital world.

Lessig to fight Warner Music for fair use

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

Lawrence Lessig, who garnered a lot of attention earlier this year with an appearance on The Colbert Report about copyright and remixing, was recently issued a Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notice by Warner Music for a YouTube presentation, according to Ars Technica.

The growing volume of infringing content on YouTube has made it a major target for DMCA takedown notices. Unfortunately, the content producers that are flooding the site with takedowns are rarely taking adequate steps to ensure the validity of their claims and are indiscriminately targeting videos that fall within the boundaries of fair use.

Professor Lessig has spent most of his career focusing on the law and technology as it relates to copyright, and has already protested the takedown notice, citing fair use for the audio clips used in the presentation.

Lessig is strongly committed to educating the public, lawmakers, and the content industry about the importance of protecting fair use from DMCA abuses, so it seems likely that he will take advantage of Warner’s mistake to raise awareness of the issue. The fact that the notice was issued at all serves as yet another reminder of how easily the barrage of poorly considered DMCA takedowns can hit innocent bystanders.

This is yet another example of why professional writers need to be aware of and consider fair use, copyright, and other issues of authorship when writing for the web or when gathering clips for remix writing.

Professional writing professor Martine Rife recently testified before the Library of Congress US Copyright Office to argue in favor of expanding the DMCA to include professional writing students and their teachers, as well as any and all non-commercial use.

To learn more about the hearings and the DMCA, check out Martine’s blog, Radical Transparency, for a list of resources and links. You can also follow the process as Lessig fights the takedown notice on his blog or Twitter.

Professional writing professor to testify about copyright

Thursday, April 23rd, 2009

On May 6-7, 2009, Martine Courant Rife, a professional writing professor at both Lansing Community College and Michigan State University, will be traveling to Washington, DC to testify at the Library of Congress US Copyright Office before the Librarian of Congress and the US Registrar of Copyrights about exemptions to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA; Section 1201[a][1] title 17, United States Code).

Every three years the US Copyright office has rulemaking proceedings in order to gather evidence about creating exemptions to the DMCA. The DMCA makes it illegal to hack into a DVD even if the purpose of that hacking is to gather clips to be used as “fair use” such as in remix writing. Specifically, the law states: “No person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.”

These rulemaking proceedings have taken place three previous times. In 2006, some film professors requested an exemption and were granted that. The exemption reads as follows:

“Audiovisual works included in the educational library of a college or university’s film or media studies department, when circumvention is accomplished for the purpose of making compilations of portions of those works for educational use in the classroom by media studies or film professors.”

The rulemaking process includes submitting comments and responses to comments as well as requests to testify. In general, the educational community is asking for the film studies professor exemption to be expanded. In contrast, groups/companies like Time Warner and the Motion Picture Association of America do not favor such expansion. The hearings will decide this issue, and also decide whether the original film studies exemption will continue into the future.

Martine is arguing both in favor of expanding the exemption to include professional writing students and their teachers, as well as any/all non-commercial use. She’s also arguing in favor of including all DVDs, even those not owned by an institution’s library. Her request to testify can be read here (PDF).

For more information about the DMCA and the rulemaking procedures, click here. The schedule for the hearings is also available for viewing.

Martine’s research is at the intersection of intellectual property and professional writing. She has been teaching at Lansing Community College for nine years, and she recently received her PhD in Rhetoric & Writing from Michigan State University. She serves as an Affiliate Researcher for the WIDE Research Center at MSU, and is also a licensed attorney. She can be reached at martinerife@gmail.com.

Legal Issues in Global Contexts: Call for proposals

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

Technical Communication, the journal of the Society for Technical Communication (STC), is soliciting article proposals for an upcoming special issue that will examine how factors of law and of culture affect how technical communicators work in international and cross-cultural contexts. This special issue will be published in November 2010, and the guest editors are Kirk St. Amant of East Carolina University and Martine Courant Rife of Lansing Community College.

SPECIAL ISSUE DESCRIPTION
Legal issues are increasingly affecting the work we do as industry practitioners, academic researchers, university and college educators, and independent entrepreneurs in technical communication. In some cases, these legal issues involve notions of ownership, copyright, and trade secrets. In other instances, legal concerns related to privacy, disclosure, and free speech affect how technical communicators perform different activities. These legal issues are further complicated by different cultural perspectives related to working in global environments and to addressing the informational needs of different cultural groups within our own nations. Very few individuals in technical communication, however, are lawyers or have formal training in issues of law and its intersection with different cultural communication expectations and assumptions. This special issue of Technical Communication will examine the legal issues affecting technical communication practices related to designing materials for or to working with individuals from other nations and cultures.

POSSIBLE TOPICS FOR THIS SPECIAL ISSUE
The guest editors invite proposals for papers on applied research or theory, case histories/studies, tutorials, and/or annotated bibliographies that address the following issues:

  • Why should technical communicators attend to global/international legal issues? Why not?
  • What kind of training should technical communicators have to address issues of law and culture effectively in international and domestic contexts?
  • How are legal issues or requirements related to language and translation affecting technical communication practices?
  • How should technical communicators working in international organizations approach legal issues? Should these issues be turned over to the “legal department”? Should technical communicators have input on organization policies with respect to implementing law? Should they be seen as experts in this area? Why or why not?
  • What developments in international law, treaties, or global-context legal conversations may impact the work of technical communicators (e.g., the EU Data Protection Directive, TRIPS [Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights], conversations on appropriation of traditional knowledge)? What recommendations might be developed to work within or challenge these new developments?
  • How do legal issues affect communication practices in globally distributed virtual teams?
  • What kinds of legal issues do international practices such as off shoring raise for technical communicators? How do these issues affect technical communication practices or provide new opportunities for technical communicators to contribute value to their organizations?
  • How have legal issues in global contexts become more immediate with regard to the continual growth of and use of online media in international contexts?
  • In what ways can our history of examining issues of intercultural communication contribute to how we approach legal issues in global contexts?
  • How do cultural differences related to intellectual property and copyright affect technical communication practices – particularly practices involving globally distributed teams?
  • How do issues of government surveillance and data mining affect the ways in which technical communicators interact in globally distributed workplaces or use online media to present information and exchange ideas across cultures?
  • How can aligning global legal issues and local legal issues help – or complicate how we work and conduct research as technical communicators?
  • What kinds of theories or research methods from the field of technical communication might inform our ability to understand legal issues in global contexts?
  • In what ways can/should technical communicators enter into public discussions about global-legal issues?

SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
Proposals should be no more than 400 words in length. All proposals should include submitter name, affiliation, and email address as well as a working title for the proposed article.

PRODUCTION SCHEDULE
The schedule for the special issue is as follows:
1 June 2009 — 400-word proposals due
15 June 2009 – Guest editors return proposal decisions to submitters
1 October 2009 – Draft manuscripts of accepted proposals due
15 February 2010 — Final manuscripts due
November 2010 — Publication date of special issue

CONTACT INFORMATION
Completed proposals or questions about either proposal topics or this special issue should be sent to Kirk St. Amant and Martine Courant Rife at tc.special.issue@gmail.com.

Lessig on The Colbert Report

Monday, January 12th, 2009

In case you missed it, Lawrence Lessig was recently featured on Comedy Central’s The Colbert Report.

Lessig is a professor at Stanford Law School, and has spent most of his career focusing on the law and technology as it relates to copyright.  He is also the author of Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy.

Be sure to check out Martine Courant Rife’s guest post on copyright and digital writing.

Guest Blog: Copyright and Digital Writing

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

Martine Courant Rifebeyondwords would like to welcome today’s guest blog author, Martine Courant Rife. Martine teaches technical writing at Lansing Community College and she is a recent recipient of a PhD in Rhetoric & Writing from Michigan State University. She is also an attorney admitted to practice in two states with an active license in Michigan.

Martine generally writes on the topic of copyright and digital writing, and we invited her to share her findings from a study she conducted that explored how copyright influences writing practices for professional writers. Check out Martine’s insights on how professional writers need to consider fair use, copyright, and other issues of authorship when writing for the web.


Last fall, with the help of the Writing in Digital Environments Research Center at Michigan State University, I conducted a study among technical and professional writers (writing in educational contexts), “Is there a Chilling of Digital Communication,” exploring how copyright influences their writing practices – how much they understand copyright, how important they think it is, and whether or not copyright is causing problems or otherwise influencing choices these writers make when composing for the web. I think we can pretty much agree that there really isn’t a way around the “copyright problem” when writing in digital environments, and this fact was agreed on by the writers in the study.

The study used a digital survey (created on Survey Monkey) of over 300 writers, as well as face-to-face interviews with seven digital writers who were professional writing students or had recently graduated with professional writing degrees. During the interviews, the writers shared some of their web compositions/web designs, and talked to me about how copyright law did or did not influence the choices they made when writing for the web. (more…)